Categories
Hazing News

Hazing play? In LA, you pay

Link and excerpt:

$1.43 million deal in LAFD-hazing suit
City will pay firefighter tricked into eating dog food
BY BETH BARRETT and KERRY CAVANAUGH, Staff Writers
LA Daily News
Article Last Updated:09/22/2007 12:35:38 AM PDT

Capping a high-profile case that had pitted the mayor against the city attorney, Los Angeles officials agreed on Friday to pay nearly $1.5 million to settle a racial-discrimination lawsuit filed by a black firefighter whose colleagues put dog food in his spaghetti.

Under the deal, the city will pay Tennie Pierce $1.43 million. He also will get $60,000 in back salary, which makes him eligible to receive his 20-year service pension.

With attorney fees and legal expenses, the cost of the case is expected to be about $2.7 million – about the same settlement that had been proposed by City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo and approved by the City Council last year.

But Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa vetoed that deal, and Pierce pressed forward with his lawsuit. The case was set to go to trial in just days.

“Today’s agreement is the best possible outcome for the taxpayers,” Villaraigosa said in a statement. “It reduces the original settlement by nearly half while protecting Angelenos from further liability.”

Negotiated by City Council President Eric Garcetti with Pierce’s lawyers, the settlement bypassed Delgadillo and his office’s outside lawyers – who had incurred about $1.35 million in fees in the case.

Since Villaraigosa’s veto of the initial deal, the mayor and city attorney have been at loggerheads.

Delgadillo and outside counsel had recommended a settlement no lower than $1.9 million, but the mayor had sought a much lower figure.

Still, after Brenda Lee, a black, lesbian firefighter, won $6.2 million in a jury settlement against the city on the grounds of discrimination and retaliation, some had begun to push for settlement talks with Pierce rather than let his lawsuit go to trial.

“I’m very pleased that we have settled this matter to save taxpayer money,” Garcetti said.

“To help Mr. Pierce move on with the next chapter in his life and to get to the real hard work of restoring the reputation of a great department, I’m very pleased to have helped that occur, and it couldn’t have happened without all parties’ willingness to come to an agreement.”

Matt Szabo, a spokesman for the mayor, said if Delgadillo had reached the same deal a year ago, “The city would not have incurred any additional legal costs.”

A spokesman for Delgadillo, citing attorney-client privilege, said the office could not comment on how final settlement negotiations were conducted.

“The city attorney supports the settlement as a fiscally responsible outcome for the city. The city attorney is pleased this matter has been resolved,” spokesman Nick Velasquez said.

Garcetti said he got involved when negotiations appeared stuck and trial was scheduled to begin Monday.

“Being the elected leader of this body and having a great relationship with the mayor, I thought it might be helpful,” Garcetti said.

As part of the deal, Pierce will resign from the Los Angeles Fire Department and drop all claims against the city.

“Mr. Pierce agreed to the settlement because it was in the best interest of his family to put this case behind them,” said his attorney, Genie Harrison.

“He is moving on to the next chapter of his life knowing he made a significant contribution to changing the Los Angeles Fire Department culture for the better.”

Councilman Dennis Zine, the only council member to oppose the initial $2.7 million settlement last year, had pushed for outside counsel to take the case from the city attorney.

On Friday, Zine said he thought the Pierce case should have been decided by a jury.

“He was a well-known prankster,” he said. “I’d have taken it to court.”

After the council agreed to settle last year, several photos emerged that showed Pierce and other firefighters smearing mustard and other liquids on colleagues tied to chairs or gurneys.

The images became talk-radio fodder, and Zine and Councilman Bill Rosendahl tried to get the council to reconsider the settlement deal.

On Friday, Zine also questioned the $1.35 million in fees to outside counsel Jones Day.

Delgadillo’s office noted that those attorney fees will push the total settlement to $2.84 million – a higher price tag than the city would have spent if the council had followed his advice last year.

But sources said talks are under way to try to lower the outside-attorney fees to bring the final figure under $2.7 million.

“I don’t know what they did for that amount of money,” Zine said. “It was absolutely too much. What did they accomplish? You add up what they get and what he gets, and where do you get? I’m not happy with the outcome.”

Jones Day attorney Patricia A. Kinaga declined to comment Friday.

About two weeks ago, amid continuing efforts to negotiate a deal, sources said an agreement of $1.9 million was reached, but the mayor vowed to veto it.

That left matters unresolved and opened the door to Garcetti’s involvement, sources said.

“My concern was the precedent of the (Lee) case and what that portended for this case. I was always concerned about that,” Councilwoman Jan Perry said.

“If it hadn’t been for Eric, we would not be where we are, and given the female firefighter’s case, this is a good outcome.”

Fire Commission President Genethia Hudley-Hayes said she wasn’t prepared to comment on the settlement, but felt Pierce deserved something after what he went through.

“My concern is simply that Tennie Pierce is compensated for the harm done in terms of anyone having to eat dog food, no matter what,” Hudley-Hayes said.

“Whether it was racially motivated or not, the fact that professionals, people he worked with, thought that was a good thing to do, I don’t care what the circumstances were. … It was a terrible thing to happen to him.”

Categories
Hazing News

Franklin College launches start of Hazing Prevention Week

Highlight on Hazing
Father, brother of hazing victim visit college to educate against the deadly crime

By Andrew Walker
awalker@franklincollege.edu
The Franklin student newspaper, Franklin College (IN)

William Meredith watches video of his son Chad playing little league baseball. The nearly 30 students in the room see the father beam as Chad drives an inside fastball over the left field fence.
“Chad would never talk the talk,” William said. “He would always walk the walk. Everyone on his teams knew he was a quiet leader.”
Chad’s baseball career at Warren Central High School led him to the University of Miami in Florida, a school nationally known for college baseball.
Things then took an ugly turn for the worse.
Chad Meredith cramped up crossing a small lake in a 2001 fraternity hazing, and, while under the influence of alcohol, he drowned in just over six feet of water.
National Hazing Prevention Week is Sept. 24-28. Franklin College Professor Hank Nuwer, author of four books on hazing, decided to have William Meredith and his oldest son, Jerry, discuss Chad’s situation and the dangers of hazing with two Franklin classes.
“This was the first time that we’ve ever been to a classroom,” William Meredith said. “Our main purpose is to get the word out and let people know about how there is such an undercurrent about hazing in our society that is just not talked about.”
Freshman Kia Arion is a student in Nuwer’s LA 112 Sports Journalism course.
“It was really sad hearing Mr. Meredith talk about his son,” Arion said. “It is just sad that it all had to end when he was so young, and to have such a tragic death like that makes it even worse.”
Freshman Aaron Hommell said that Meredith’s story might have given him a different perspective as he pledges for a fraternity in the upcoming weeks.
“I had not heard of the death of Mr. Meredith’s son prior to that class,” Hommell said. “I will be joining a fraternity this fall, but I will tell you right now, hazing surely will not be a part of my experience.”
Tracy Maxwell, Executive Director of the website HazingPrevention.org, said that hazing does not necessarily have to be deadly to make its mark.
“Student deaths from hazing are tragic, but I would like students to focus on the everyday pain and hurt caused by these practices,” Maxwell said. “[Hazing] injures self- esteem, causes a great deal of anguish and has no place in organizations who espouse leadership as one of its main goals.”
Jerry Meredith said that many of these organizations sweep hazing under the rug.
“Part of the reason that the story is not out there is because nobody is talking about them,” Jerry Meredith said. “Those that are hazing, they are pushing that this is not to be spoken about, and there is some secrecy there.”
Nuwer was a witness to an athletic hazing initiation at the University of Nevada-Reno that later was repeated and ended in a death. He said witnesses to hazing have two options.
“You can call 911 if you can’t handle the situation right there,” Nuwer said. “Or try to get another bystander to come in there with you to say just two words: ‘far enough.’”
Franklin Athletic Director and Head Men’s Basketball Coach Kerry Prather said although there has not been a history of hazing here, last year he thought it was important to initiate a school-wide hazing policy.
“[Hazing] has become an important topic of conversation at all levels of athletics,” Prather said.
“We chose to get ahead of the issue and be proactive.”
Because of the Chad Meredith Act of Florida, the Sunshine State now has one of the toughest hazing laws in the United States.
“The one good thing that can come out of our son’s death is to get the word out — to let people know about [hazing], and risks and dangers,” William Meredith said.
Recently, two men began serving two-year sentences for a hazing beating at Florida A&M.
“Chad loved to hit against the tougher competition,” William Meredith said.
Chad Meredith can touch them all.
With his law, he has hit another home run.

Categories
Hazing News

Beta Blocker: Matt’s law faces challenge in court

Link and excerpt:

 

Defense still critical of revised hazing complaint
By TERRY VAU DELL – Staff Writer
Chico Enterprise-Record

Article Launched:09/20/2007 12:09:57 AM PDT
OROVILLE — The attorneys for three banned Beta Theta Pi fraternity leaders accused of hazing about a dozen pledges last spring assert that an amended criminal complaint filed in the case Wednesday is still legally deficient.

A judge had previously upheld a defense motion called a “demur,” giving the prosecution 10 days to reword the charging document to clarify the allegations against the trio.

The case will be back in court Oct. 29 when the lawyers for the accused fraternity members say they will again try to get the charges thrown out on grounds they are being prevented from adequately defending their clients at trial.

The prosecutor maintains the rewording of the criminal complaint not only complies with the judge’s order, but goes farther by actually specifying individual alleged acts of hazing committed by the fraternity leaders.

The amended complaint filed Wednesday adds language directly from Matt’s Law, a 2007 statute which for the first time criminalizes hazing activities on California school campuses or in fraternal organizations.

The new law was enacted by the state Legislature this summer in memory of Matthew Carrington, a 21-year-old Chico State University pledge who died as a result of being forced to drink excessive amounts of water in a chilled basement during an initiation ceremony to another Chico fraternity in 2005.

The current hazing case is the first to be prosecuted in California under Matt’s Law. If convicted of the misdemeanor charges the three Chico fraternity officials could face up to one year in jail and $5,000 in fines.

The prosecution alleges the former Beta Theta Pi president David Bizot, 23, vice president, Michael Francis Murphy, 22, and ritualist, Matthew William Krupp, 23, “engaged in a form of initiation and pre-initiation into a student organization and student body at California State University, Chico, in a manner likely to cause serious bodily injury … by means of excessive forced strenuous physical activity and exposure to unhealthful ice baths.”

District Attorney Mike Ramsey had earlier told reporters about a dozen pledges were forced to crawl through mud, engage in rigorous calisthenics and also stand in a bath tub filled with ice water while being grilled about fraternity lore.

William Mayo, Bizot’s attorney, argues that while an improvement over the first “ambiguous” criminal complaint, he says he is unclear what forced strenuous physical activity the prosecutor is referring to.

Moreover, the defense contends the charging document must identify one or more victims so the defense can adequately investigate and prepare the case for trial.

But deputy district attorney Michael Sanderson contends he need only prove to a judge or jury that the alleged hazing took place, regardless of whether any of those involved felt themselves to be victims.

“We have witnesses that we believe will testify to the impact these activities had on them; it doesn’t necessarily make them victims,” said the prosecutor outside of court.

Sanderson points out, for example, that rarely are victims named in drunken driving cases either.

But Mayo counters in most DUI cases, the arresting officer witnesses the crime and can testify about it later in court.

But in the Chico hazing case, campus police are relying on information that was given to them second-hand by those involved in the fraternity initiation.

“Hazing is not a victimless crime. We have a right to confront our accusers,” the defense attorney asserts.

When she gave the district attorney the option of rewording the criminal complaint or face possible dismissal of the case two weeks ago, newly-appointed Butte County Superior Court Judge Tamara Mosbarger said she agreed with the prosecution that the state of California could be listed as the sole hazing victim.

But the lawyers for the accused fraternity members, say now that specific hazing allegations have been lodged against their clients, they must revisit the victimization question.

“Do we have to investigate everybody who was there (at the fraternity initiation) and spend tens of thousands of dollars, only to find out only one guy is going to show up at trial?” asks Mayo.

“Who does it hurt to simply say Joe Blow was the person who was subjected to these ice baths?” the defense lawyer added.

Categories
Hazing News

Wright and Gordie Foundation

NEW OCTOBER 6: view the trailer of the film 

from a submitted press release from the Gordie Foundation

ROBIN WRIGHT PENN NAMED
HONORARY CHAIRPERSON OF
THE GORDIE FOUNDATION

Actress Robin Wright Penn has accepted the position of Honorary Chairperson of
Dallas-based, The Gordie Foundation aimed at stopping alcohol abuse and unnecessary hazing on college and university campuses across the country.

She will assume the position immediately by appearing in a promotional segment for the film HAZE, presented by the foundation to raise awareness and a passion to solve this national issue. The film will be released in the first quarter of 2008.

Although she was born in Dallas and then raised in San Diego, Robin Wright Penn lives in Northern California, with her husband Sean Penn and two children, Dylan Frances and Hopper Jack.

Her acting career gained notoriety when she played Kelly Capwell on the Soap Opera Santa Barbara, Buttercup in the film The Princess Bride and Jenny Curran in Forrest Gump, earning her a Golden Globe nomination for Best Supporting Actress.

The Gordie Foundation is dedicated to the memory of Gordie Bailey, who passed away in Sept., 2004 from alcohol poisoning as a result of a fraternity hazing at the University of Colorado. He was 18-years-old.

“We are ecstatic to have someone of Robin’s stature accepting this Honorary Chairperson position,” said Michael B. Lanahan, President of The Gordie Foundation Board of Directors. “There are 1,700 student deaths per year and close to 100,000 cases of sexual assault that result from binge drinking and over zealous hazing on our campuses. We are convinced that Robin’s presence and message can help wake up our nation to the crisis at hand.”

“For some time I have followed the story of Gordie Bailey and the work of the Foundation Board and Gordie’s mother, Leslie Lanahan, to promote responsible drinking on campuses,” said Robin Wright Penn.

“The work they have done, and the work that I hope to do as a concerned parent, is extremely important in trying to save a valuable life. Over time, we will be successful in inspiring local and national leaders to find a way to solve these tragedies on campuses.