Categories
Hazing News

Old beliefs die hard. The Daily Breeze editors printed a letter advocating sadism in the name of military training.

Regarding the Daily Breeze letter below: Hazing is against the law. Would the Daily Press have printed this letter if
the writer had advocated the value of comitting some other crime involving sadism or masochism? I don’t blame the writer. He believes what he believes. But the Daily Press editors are the gatekeepers, the journalistic watchdogs. I think their editorial judgment was off line here in printing the letter. Carrying a  well-researched article on why such misguided beliefs still exist in the military makes more sense. Moderator

(letter below)

I read with mixed emotions the story of the “hazing” of young Marines at Naval Weapons Station Yorktown (“Marine relieved of command,” Sept. 11). As a former Marine who spent two years in special operation capable units, I can tell you that during my era of service “hazing” was never an issue: It was a matter of fact.

In every elite Marine unit, as well as the entire 6th Marine Infantry regiment, it was a rite of passage when you reported in. I still carry my “burn-in” mark for the Pathfinder platoon of the 22nd MEUSOC, a round white scar the size of a pencil eraser, where another Marine and I laid a lit cigarette lengthwise in the trough formed by our locked forearms and waited until it went out. That was on the first night. It got tougher after that.

The FAST unit at Yorktown is no ordinary detachment; they are, in fact, elite troops expected to perform at a very high level of combat skills. Brutality in training has always been controversial, but the harshness of training in the Marine Corps has paid huge dividends on the battlefield.

I would hope that the NCOs who are charged with maltreatment of subordinates are judged by those who have been shot at.

Ron Inman

Poquoson

Categories
Hazing News

5 years after the Alpha sorority drownings: nothing but loss all around, writes Sandy Banks

Excerpt from the LA Times
Five years later, still haunted by drowning
September 15, 2007

She doesn’t talk much about her daughter these days. She’s accepted the fact that Kristin is gone, that life goes on, that the answers she needs may never come.

It’s been five years since police showed up in the middle of the night to tell Patricia Strong-Fargas that her 22-year-old daughter, Kristin High, had drowned in high surf at Dockweiler State Beach.

Police said it was an accidental drowning. Officers pulled the bodies of Kristin and 24-year-old old Kenitha Saafir from the water just before midnight Sept. 9, 2002.

Television news reports would later describe the dead women, both Cal State L.A. students, as “coeds partying at the beach.”

But a lawsuit filed in 2002 by Strong-Fargas alleged a more troubling explanation: The young women died in a hazing ritual while pledging one of the country’s most venerated black sororities.

The sorority denied responsibility and said there was no official chapter at Cal State L.A. No criminal charges were ever filed against anyone involved. But the official explanations have never comforted Strong-Fargas.

Kristin was always a type-A daughter. Super student, athlete, campus leader, mother of a 2-year-old son. Joining Alpha Kappa Alpha was something she had always wanted.

But her mother said the weeks-long process of pledging was more grueling than Kristin had imagined. She’d straggle home late at night, exhausted and edgy. She wouldn’t talk about what was going on. “I didn’t worry as much as I should,” Strong-Fargas said this week. “There were things I missed, because I trusted her. Kristin was always on top of things.”

According to her family’s lawsuit, Kristin, Kenitha and two other pledges were worked nightly to exhaustion, in sessions that often lasted until 1 or 2 a.m.

The night they died, the lawsuit claims, they’d spent hours at the beach doing calisthenics before they were ordered to walk backward into the ocean. A wave hit Kenitha and knocked her down. Kristin knew Kenitha couldn’t swim, so she went in after her. Both were dragged by high waves under the water, the lawsuit alleges.

That is what Kristin’s mother believes, based on witness accounts collected by the family’s private investigator, Robert Freeman.

She doesn’t know for sure because the two pledges who survived won’t talk to her.

The next day, when the young women brought Kristin’s car home, her mother said Kristin’s pledge journal was missing and numbers had been deleted from her cellphone. “They wanted to just drop the keys and run,” Strong-Fargas said when I interviewed her this week at the small Christian school she runs in South Los Angeles.

“These were girls who had spent hours at our home, who had eaten with my family, played with Kristin’s son. They were the only ones who could tell me what happened to my daughter. And they couldn’t even look at me in my face.”

Accusations of hazing surfaced almost immediately, but were never proven.

“I’ve had an easier time infiltrating street gangs than penetrating this organization,” Freeman, a former cop, told me not long after the young women died, a few months into his investigation for the family.

Alpha Kappa Alpha leaders said from the start that the group had no role in the deaths. The sorority’s chapter at Cal State L.A. had been suspended for hazing, so the pledging process was unsanctioned.

Like every collegiate Greek organization, the sorority has rules against hazing — a “risk management” policy, their website calls it.

According to those who track hazing injuries, more than 80 pledges have been killed or injured around the country in the last 15 years during rites that involve binge drinking, beatings or extreme physical exertion. But the deaths of Kristin and Kenitha had special resonance among Greek-letter organizations. “Their deaths were like 9/11 for fraternities and sororities,” said Lawrence Ross Jr., the author of a book on black Greek organizations and an anti-hazing lecturer on campuses. “It forced a lot of people out of denial.”

As a reporter, I covered the story when they died. I suspected from the first bare-bones account that this was no simple jaunt on the beach. Because when I was a college student, I pledged a sorority.

The insults, the paddling, the forced exercise routines that I endured went beyond humiliating and veered perilously close to dangerous. But I didn’t balk.

Then, I believed the party line: Surviving brutality was a badge of honor, keeping secrets a measure of loyalty. Now, I’m not so sure.

I’ve always been glad that I pledged and proud I made it through. As difficult as it sometimes was, the process gave me confidence, and taught me to draw on an inner strength that’s served me well in adulthood.

But then I made it out alive.

Now, 35 years down the line, I’m no longer courting the respect of would-be sorority sisters. I’m a mother with a daughter in college. And I’m wondering what secrets I’ll be willing to share if she comes to me one day and says, “Mom, I’m thinking of pledging a sorority.”

The full story from that night may never be told. Both families sued the sorority. After months of depositions — and Strong-Fargas sat through every one — the lawsuits against Alpha Kappa Alpha were settled. The deal that kept the cases out of court included a financial payout that the families are not allowed to disclose and a promise by the sorority to work harder to end hazing.

Today, to mark the fifth anniversary of her daughter’s drowning, Strong-Fargas is speaking at a forum on hazing, where students and parents can talk about how to recognize abuse and stand up to it; how to tell the difference between a wacky request and a dangerous stunt that could lead to death.

sandy.banks@latimes.com

The forum will be from 3 to 5 p.m. at St. Augustine Baptist Church, 8704 S. Figueroa Ave, South Los Angeles.

Categories
Hazing News

Recalling Old Miss’s Reid Waldrip

This Univ of Miss. editorial is now three years old: Our View – Someone needs to tell the truth about what happened to Reid Waldrip.As you flip through today’s paper, take notice of an advertisement located at the bottom of page 11.

Reid Waldrip was an ordinary Ole Miss student enjoying his freshman year of school. He was meeting new folks, surviving his classes and excited by his recent bid to Sigma Chi fraternity.

All of this changed, however, in the early morning of Oct. 7, when Waldrip, after attending a Bid Day party for his fraternity, suffered multiple, unexplained skull fractures and considerable brain damage. In the time since the incident, Reid has undergone physical, speech and occupational therapy, regaining some ability, but still having considerable trouble with his speech and the use of his right hand, his father said.

Perhaps the most disturbing part about this whole ordeal is how little has been publically disclosed about what happened that night. A large and critical information gap exists in the timeline of events.

Virtually no one knows how Reid Waldrip was hurt. His injuries were consistent with a two-story fall, though no such opportunity for one is known.

No one knows how Reid Waldrip got home. It is highly unlikely that he walked to the dorm from a party in the Shiloh subdivision having just sustained a massive head injury. If he didn’t walk, then, someone must have driven him, but not a single person has come forward to say that they saw a wounded Waldrip.

That police, university and Sigma Chi investigations and interrogations have turned up nothing is both frustrating and infuriating. Give everyone the benefit of the doubt and say that Reid’s injury was the result of a pure and unavoidable accident.

It was at a party attended by more than 50 people, and no one knows anything. It’s impossible.

Reid Waldrip will never be quite the same again, and no one even has the nerve to step forward — even anonymously — to aid this investigation? No, someone knows something. Somebody out there has information that will bring the truth about Oct. 7 into the open.

Your silence is inhumane.

If you know anything about what happened to Reid Waldrip in the Shiloh neighborhood on Oct. 7, please contact UPD, OPD, the Waldrip family, or any of the lawyers listed on page 11.

The DM Editorial Board is composed of Editor Laura Houston, Opinion Editor Marquita Brown, English major Joel Moore and biochemistry major Lara Oyetunji.

Page 1 of 1

Categories
Hazing News

Rider update

Prosecutor says he’s sorry Rider administrators were indictedBy CHRIS NEWMARKER | Associated Press Writer
8:34 AM EDT, September 15, 2007

TRENTON, N.J. – As a college student drank himself to death, two Rider University administrators had already gone home for the day, unaware of the fraternity party raging on the campus.

Yet four months later, the officials found themselves facing criminal hazing charges connected to the student’s death. The prosecutor defended the charges. A message, he said, was being sent to college administrators nationwide.

But in the end, chances are no one will go to jail for the 18-year-old’s drinking death in March. The indictments against the administrators were dropped, and most of the students indicted will avoid jail time and criminal records.

Now the prosecutor who once said the administrator indictments sent a message about the “standards of college life” says he was unsure from the beginning whether the charges would stick.

“I was grappling with it in my own mind. We were trying to figure out what to do with it,” said Mercer County Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini Jr.

In fact, Bocchini says he feels sorry that Anthony Campbell, 52, Rider’s dean of students, and Ada Badgley, 31, the university’s director of Greek life, had to face indictments. But he says the system left him no choice.

“I said, ‘Look, I have a grand jury, a legally constituted body, recognized by the courts, that comes back with this indictment. We have to look at this thoroughly. This is a highly sensitive case,”‘ Bocchini said.

But critics point out that prosecutors instructed the grand jury _ made up of 23 laypeople _ and provided the evidence it saw. And if Bocchini really thought the resulting charges were questionable, critics say he held off too long to drop them.

“He took up the court’s time. He does not get an A plus for the way he handled this,” said Hank Nuwer, an expert on hazing cases who teaches journalism at Franklin College in Franklin, Ind.

Nuwer said Bocchini’s handling of the case may actually make other prosecutors leery about indicting university officials involved with campus crimes.

The outcome has caused further grief for the family of Gary DeVercelly Jr., the 18-year-old fraternity pledge from Long Beach, Calif., who died of alcohol poisoning.

“The family’s upset that it now appears none of the wrongdoers will face any serious criminal consequences for their role in the death of their son,” said Doug Fierberg, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who’s been retained by DeVercelly’s family.

DeVercelly had a blood-alcohol level of 0.426 percent, or more than five times the Garden State’s legal limit for driving, when he was pronounced dead March 30, authorities have said.

DeVercelly died after a Phi Kappa Tau house party that prosecutors have described as a special event, in which pledges would drink large quantities of hard liquor with fraternity brothers.

The student’s death, and the evidence provided by prosecutors, ended up drawing a strong response from the grand jury.

“They were upset with the university. This was an emotional case,” Bocchini now says.

Three weeks after he announced the indictments, Bocchini asked a judge to dismiss the counts against the Campbell and Badgley.

Former state attorney general John Farmer Jr. thinks three weeks may have been a long time to wait before trying to get the counts dismissed.

“Being accused is irreparable damage to someone’ life and you need to resolve this as quickly as possible,” Farmer said.

Campbell’s lawyer, Rocco Cipparone Jr., wishes Bocchini had publicized the case in a different way.

“The result was the right result. But the process was something no one wants to go through, especially in a high profile way,” Cipparone said.

But Badgley’s lawyer, David Laigaie, thought Bocchini’s office handled the case appropriately overall.

“It was an investigative grand jury. There’s a limit to a prosecutor’s ability to instruct a grand jury to charge or not to charge,” Laigaie said.

Mitch Crane, a former municipal judge in Pennsylvania and expert on college hazing cases, also didn’t see any obvious problems with the way the Rider case was handled. Even though the charges against the administrators were dropped, he still thought the case sent a message that administrators might be criminally responsible for the actions of their students.

“In student affairs, there’s a great deal of fear throughout the country that, ‘Gee, I could be arrested and charged for something I wasn’t directly involved with,”‘ Crane said. “I don’t think the fact these charges were dropped against the dean and the Greek adviser will change that.”