These three are representative:
The Record scolds administrators
It’s hard to believe that ritualized binge drinking could take place on a campus and someone in the administration wouldn’t be aware of it. Did university officials concern themselves with what went on at pledge initiations, particularly when pledges were under 21? If they didn’t, they surely should have.
Rider University dissolved its Phi Kappa Tau chapter last week and has taken other preventive steps, such as requiring live-in advisers in all fraternities when school resumes next month. Will that be enough to prevent future tragedies?
Colleges could crack down on underage drinking in dorms and fraternities far more than they do. Often the only acknowledgement is a toothless warning to students to be responsible. Perhaps a flat zero-tolerance policy for alcohol on campus would be more effective.
You can bet that colleges will be watching the Rider case with extreme interest. If they are a little nervous, that’s good.”
Excerpt: “It will likely be difficult to convict school administrators who weren’t at the fraternity house the night DeVercelly and another student drank enough to bring on alcohol poisoning.
However, if it is determined that school officials didn’t do anything to prevent Greek organizations at Rider from hazing freshmen pledges, then they deserve punishment, as well.
DeVercelly’s death was a tragedy that could easily have been prevented. This prosecution, we hope, causes fraternity members and college administrators across the state to rethink their practices and policies on hazing and alcohol.”
With the number of college students who’ve lost their lives in ways similar to DeVercelly over the years, the time has come to end the college tradition of older fraternity members forcing young pledges to abuse alcohol. The fact that it’s illegal notwithstanding, this kind of hazing has proven time and again to have tragic results.”
Excerpt: “Mercer County Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini said the college officials were culpable, though neither he nor the one-paragraph indictment explained why.
The notion that the morning-after consequences to campus boozing can include jail time should mean something to students (in their sober moments) and, above all, to college administrators everywhere.
Prosecuting Rider’s dean of students and its director of fraternity programs shows what a high-wire act trying to prevent binge drinking can be for college administrators.
Only presentation of evidence and trial can determine whether it was fair to charge the officials, who were not at the party. For now, it’s clear only that this dramatic step will spur other campuses to redouble their campaigns against out-of-control drinking.