Categories
Hazing News

West Virginia University and Phi Kappa Psi throw the book at local chapter after pledge is hurt

Moderator: Back in mid-November, a pledge was hospitalized for a concussion and lacerations needing stitching. Police charged Andrew Nemes with battery and hazing. That case has not yet come to trial.

Here is the link to the Huffington Post

In addition to police proceedings, Phi Kappa Psi will shut its doors on Jan. 1 to begin a five semester suspension. It will then be put on inactive status. It could be five years before the fraternity is allowed back on campus.

Vice President of Student Affairs Ken Gray said in a news release, “we need to make clear that hazing will not be tolerated and if the members can’t exhibit the kind of behavior expected, the chapter will be shut down entirely.”

“Phi Kappa Psi has a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to hazing and holds the safety and well-being of our members as our top priority,” Phi Kappa Psi national Executive Director Shawn Collingsworth. “West Virginia Alpha has jeopardized that by participating in activities that aim to humiliate or harm new members and it will not be tolerated.”

Categories
Hazing News

Chicago hazing update (12/23). Trial of ex-Maine West high school coach takes on legal twists and turns

Here is the story link

Update 12:23  My friend and colleague David Westol succinctly explains what is going on procedurally below with the trial’s delay until January. Thank you: A motion for a DV (Directed Verdict) is standard in criminal cases, just as it is in civil cases, although the burden of proof is different.  The concept is simple: it gives the defense in a criminal case the opportunity to say, “Your honor, the evidence submitted by the prosecution, taken in the most favorable light to the (state), does not set forth sufficient evidence to justify a guilty verdict.  Therefore, the trial must end at this point since the prosecution has put forth all of its evidence”

Moderator:  If there is one thing, adults say over and over in high school and college hazing incidents is that “boys will be boys.” This time the attorney for embattled Maine West Coach used that argument to convince a judge to grant a stay until January

Sun-Times excerpt below.

Then, before even putting on a defense, lawyer Todd Pugh asked Cook County Judge Jeffrey L. Warnick to find Divincenzo not guilty of sanctioning a hazing culture among his players in the Northwest suburbs.

“These were definitely boys,” said Pugh, who appealed to Warnick’s personal knowledge that boys sometimes do “gross, disgusting” things.

And in an unusual move, the judge chose to put Divincenzo’s trial on hold until Jan. 8 to consider the request made after prosecutors rested their case.

Warnick’s decision could rest upon whether Divincenzo was required under Illinois’ Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act to report the alleged hazing to the state’s Department of Children and Family Services.

If he rules against Divincenzo, 37, of Elk Grove Village, the coach would still have an opportunity to put on a defense. He is charged with misdemeanor battery, hazing and failure to report abuse.

Several current and former Maine West soccer players have now testified about the apparent cycle of hazing on the varsity team. But Divincenzo’s lawyers say he knew nothing about it.

Generally, the “initiations” involved tackling a player, giving him a wedgie and sodomizing him with fingers or sticks.

One player said he was only poked in the “butt cheek,” though, and another testified Thursday his teammates simply punched him repeatedly.

Many characterized it as simple horseplay, but one boy said he limped afterward and another said he later felt pain while bending over.

Assistant State’s Attorney Margaret Ogarek said Divincenzo was responsible for the boys’ behavior because he created an environment that allowed the alleged hazing to go on for years.

She also said it’s “quite frankly, unbelievable” that Divincenzo didn’t know what was happening in his soccer program. One boy said Divincenzo said, “Welcome to the team,” after one less violent incident.

Others said he ordered the varsity team to apologize and do 100 push-ups after a more serious Sept. 26, 2012, incident that prompted a criminal investigation into the hazing. Maine West administrators said they learned what happened two days later, from the family of a freshman player.

No one at the school told DCFS until Oct. 2, 2012, lawyers said Thursday.

Finally, Ogarek underscored the testimony of former freshman players who said Divincenzo earlier told them he’d have the varsity team “take their thumbs and stick it up our butt” if they performed poorly in a drill.

Categories
Hazing News

9 Canada secondary schoolers likely back in court in January for hazing allegations

Here is the link

And the excerpt–

“Two teens charged in relation to an alleged hazing incident in Lanigan had their charges stayed by the Crown this week.

Brayden Braun and Kyle Ekstrom, both 18, and seven youths whose identities are protected by the Youth Criminal Justice Act, still face charges and are expected to enter a plea in Humboldt provincial court on Jan. 27.

In total, nine youths and the two 18-year-old men were charged in September after area teens were paddled and covered in eggs, chocolate syrup and flour.”

Categories
Hazing News

Destroyer officers destroy own careers with hazing, harassment directed at female enlistees

This was a complicated hazing incident.  The “Hazing” also has elements of sexual harassment and, though it is military hazing, it also has elements of degrading occupational hazing. Glad the Navy finds such behavior wrong.  Now get rid of the Chief’s ceremony, huh, Navy? –Opinion by Moderator Hank Nuwer

Excerpt:

The action against Cmdr. Kenneth Rice, executive officer of the USS Jason Dunham, and Master Chief Petty Officer Stephen Vandergrifft, the vessel’s top warrant officer, was announced Friday, NBC News reported.

Officials said that on Oct. 15 a chief petty officer ordered 19 women to clean out two non-functioning toilets on the Dunham, which is based in Norfolk, Va. Thirteen of the women were told to march to the dock carrying buckets of human waste and to dump it in two portable toilets.

Lt. Cmdr. Reann Mommsen, a spokeswoman for US Fleet Forces Command, said some of the women were not supplied with proper protective equipment for the job. She also said that the waste could have been disposed of on board the Dunham and ordering the women to walk it to the pier was hazing.

Cmdr. Michael Meredith, the Dunham’s commanding officer, only learned of the incident on Oct. 21 and acted properly once he was told, officials say. Officials said the charges against Rice and Vandergrifft include failing to notify Meredith.

Rice and Vandergrifft were convicted in non-judicial proceedings...

 

Categories
Hazing News

Column by Gentry McCreary Addresses Hazing Related to Federal Issues.

Here is the story link

This is a long, thoughtful piece by Dr. McCreary. I’ll post an excerpt here but recommend you click on the link above to get his entire position. –Moderator Hank Nuwer

Addressing Hazing at the Federal Level
Late last week, news broke indicating that the Fraternity and Sorority Political Action Committee (FSPAC) was actively engaged in lobbying against federal anti-hazing legislation proposed by Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL).  Her proposed legislation (which has yet to be submitted as a bill before Congress) would, among other things, require mandated reporting of hazing allegations and would eliminate Federal Financial Aid benefits to students found responsible for hazing.
According to North American Interfraternity Conference (NIC) president Pete Smithhisler (http://abcnews.go.com/Business/fraternity-group-lobbies-hazing-reform/story?id=19766121), the Fraternal Government Relations Committee (FGRC) has, in fact, met with Rep. Wilson regarding concerns about her proposed legislation, and public records indicate that the FSPAC donated $1,000 to her campaign fund.  The FGRC training packet for the April 2013 congressional visits contains a brief section regarding hazing legislation, including this excerpt:
While we lead the fight against hazing, we do not think it should be a federal issue. For many legal and policy reasons, we oppose proposed legislation that denies federal financial aid to students subject to a university sanction for hazing. We believe this legislation would result in more problems than it solves in regards to hazing.
While their critiques of the legislation are legitimate, their involvement in lobbying against proposed hazing legislation could be problematic, especially for the NIC and the National Panhellenic Conference (NPC), the two groups who founded and financially support the FGRC.  Public commentary from FRGC leadership has always suggested that their lobbying efforts included three main legislative priorities: to protect fraternity/sorority exemptions articulated under Title IX, to protect tax deductions for fraternity/sorority charitable contributions, and to promote the Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act (CHIA), which would allow for tax-deductible gifts towards fraternity/sorority housing.  Public documents and websites related to the FGRC and the NIC/NPC government relations efforts make little mention of any lobbying on behalf of or in opposition to federal hazing legislation.  In a phone conversation, Pete Smithhisler indicated that the decision was made to only communicate the hazing lobbying effort “to our internal constituents” (Pete Smithhisler, Personal Communication, July 25, 2013).  Based on this admission, it appears that many individuals may have donated to the FSPAC under the auspices of supporting CHIA, with no knowledge that the funds would be used to lobby for or against federal anti-hazing legislation.
Social media has been abuzz with conversation regarding this revelation.  Those defending the NIC/FGRC/FSPAC are quick to point out the flaws in Rep. Wilson’s proposed legislation (http://wilson.house.gov/press-releases/congresswoman-wilson-announces-framework-for-anti-hazing-legislation/).  This criticism is not without merit.  Her proposal of denying federal financial aid benefits to any student found responsible for hazing, or witnessing hazing but not reporting it, would have far-reaching unintended consequences and would disproportionately affect low-income students.
With that said, some of the arguments against her proposed legislation appear misguided.  Several have argued that there is no need for a federal anti-hazing bill – that the issue is best left to the states.  The argument that only the states should be involved in hazing does not reflect an understanding of existing prevention framework.  Those who study the science of prevention are well aware of Bronfebrenner’s “Social Ecological Model” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_ecological_model).  The Social Ecological Model describes various levels of intervention that can affect behavior change.  The outermost layer, the “macro-system,” is often thought of in regards to public policy.  The laws governing any particular behavior are an important part of promoting change with regards to that behavior.  This is a basic tenant of the framework taught at the Novak Institute for Hazing Prevention, and has been previously discussed when comparing the anti-bullying movement to the hazing prevention movement (http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Learning-from-the-Anti-Bullying-Movement.html?soid=1101826026302&aid=OBB2_TrwoF0).
Furthermore, the federal government has demonstrated its ability to bring about behavioral change on college campuses.  For an example of this, one should look no further than the April 2011 “Dear Colleague Letter” from the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/dear_colleague_sexual_violence.pdf).  This letter, and the laws that now undergird it (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/vawa_factsheet.pdf), have drastically improved the way that college campuses prevent and respond to allegations of sexual misconduct.  Sadly, it appears that the FGRC, along with the leadership of the NIC and NPC, have also lobbied against those reforms (http://www.fspac.org/images/uploads/FratPAC_S12_Newsletter.pdf).
Assuming that the FGRC is genuine in its assertion that it would support “well-crafted” federal anti-hazing legislation, it is worth proposing what effective federal legislation might look like.  The following list includes a number of possible ways that hazing prevention could be enacted at the federal level:
 
Include Hazing in Clery Report Statistics
The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act was passed in 1990 in response to the 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Clery at Lehigh University.  The Clery Act requires, among other things, colleges to publish an annual security report.  This report contains statistics about campus crime, including crimes of violence and crimes involving violations of drug and alcohol laws.  The Clery Act was amended in 2013 as part of the Violence Against Women Act to include a number of new crimes in the security report, including domestic violence and stalking.
Many campuses attempt to keep hazing allegations and investigations quiet in an effort to reduce negative publicity and to curry favor with prominent alumni.  As a result, prospective students and their parents are often ill-informed regarding the prevalence of hazing on the campuses they are considering attending.  By including hazing allegations on the Clery Report, prospective students will be able to  make better-informed decisions, and campuses will be more accountable for their respective hazing cultures.  Furthermore, as organizational conduct records are not protected by FERPA, campuses could be required to publish the names of any organizations found responsible for hazing in their Clery Report.  This would add an additional layer of accountability to both the institutions and the organizations involved in hazing.