Categories
Hazing News

Thoughtful New York Times essay on alcohol and fraternities by John Hechinger

Here is the essay link and a brief excerpt

Fraternity initiation season has just begun and already an 18-year-old freshman is dead. An investigation into the death of the student, who had been drinking at Louisiana State University’s Phi Delta Theta house, will most likely point to a familiar culprit: the toxic brew of alcohol and hazing.

The Louisiana case is only the latest example in a horrifying but persistent trend. At Penn State, 14 Beta Theta Pi members will soon face a criminal trial because a pledge, or new member, died of traumatic brain injuries in February. They are accused of ordering him to drink until he could barely stand.

Alcohol is the wellspring of most fraternity vice, and evidence shows that reducing drinking at chapters makes them safer — and not just for fraternity brothers. According to the National Institute of Justice, women who frequent frat parties are more likely to become victims of “incapacitated sexual assault.” Many fraternity brothers and alumni maintain that fraternities shouldn’t be blamed for excessive drinking — that it is just a part of college life — but the numbers tell a different story.

Study after study has shown that fraternity men are the heaviest drinkers on campus. According to Harvard public-health research, considered the most definitive, 86 percent of men living in chapter houses binge on alcohol, twice the level of those who live elsewhere. A University of Maine survey found that three-quarters of fraternity members report they’ve been hazed, including being forced to drink into unconsciousness.

Phi Delta Theta has mostly stayed out of the headlines until now, but as the death at L.S.U. shows, efforts to cut down drinking require constant vigilance. The success of public health campaigns provides an apt comparison: They haven’t eliminated smoking or drunken driving, but they have saved millions of lives.

Banning pledging, the dangerous monthslong initiation period, also helps. For about a decade, Sigma Alpha Epsilon had more hazing and alcohol-related deaths than any other fraternity; it banned pledging altogether in 2014, and since then insurance claims have dropped from an average of 13 a year to two, and no one has died from hazing or drinking. Enforcement has been key: More than 30 chapters have been closed for alcohol violations.

Measures that cut down on hazing and drinking don’t just protect students from danger, they can also shield their finances. When lawsuits proliferated and insurance premiums soared in the 1980s and 1990s, fraternities risked losing coverage for their considerable wealth, which includes more than $3 billion in real estate. They, with their insurers, created plans that excluded claims related to underage drinking, hazing and sexual assault.

It makes sense that fraternities didn’t want to provide insurance that, in effect, subsidized bad behavior.  Read more at the earlier link.

Categories
Hazing News

Chapter of Beta Theta Pi in Court

Link

Excerpt from WTAJ

The Alpha Upsilon Chapter appeared in court Wednesday.

A lawyer for the Alpha Upsilon chapter of Beta Theta Pi appeared in court Wednesday. That parent organization is charged with 50 counts of hazing and a total of 96 counts of alcohol related charges in connection with the death of Timothy Piazza.

A motion has also been filed to remove the attorney for the Alpha Upsilon chapter.

Categories
Hazing News

New scholarship: License to bully: rites of passage in higher education

  • Ana Cristina da Silva
  • Minoo Farhangmehr
  • Marjan Sara Jalali
Original Article

Abstract

This study examines the existence of bullying behaviours in the relatively under-studied setting of higher education institutions (HEI), and in the context of the initiation rites which in many countries come associated with entry into these institutions, in particular. Findings from our in-depth interviews with former, current and prospective university students indicate that bullying in universities exists, is closely intertwined with initiation rituals and their associated activities, and furthermore assumes various forms. This reality leads to a dissonance in respondents’ understanding and descriptions of the initiation rites – a conflict between the intended purpose of integration on the one hand, and the often oppressive practice of these rituals on the other. The initiation rites were furthermore perceived as legitimising and perpetuating otherwise unacceptable and overbearing behaviours. The findings indicate an important role for social marketing in helping mitigate bullying behaviours in initiation rituals, as well as creating upstream pressure for change by policy makers.

Keywords

Bullying Social marketing Higher education Initiation rites Hazing 

References

  1. Allan, E. J. (2009). Hazing in view: College students at risk. Initial findings from the National Study of student hazing. Collingdale: Diane Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Alsaker, F. D., & Nägele, C. (2008). Bullying in kindergarten and prevention. In D. Pepler, & W. Craig (Eds.), Understanding and addressing bullying: An international perspective(pp. 230–252). Kingston: PREVNet: Kingston, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  3. Assembleia da República. (2008). Comissão de Educação e Ciência. “As praxes académicas em Portugal” – Relatório – Abril.Google Scholar
  4. Barboza, G. E., Schiamberg, L. B., Oehmke, J., Korzeniewski, S. J., Post, L. A., & Heraux, C. G. (2009). Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: An ecological perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barros, P. C., Carvalho, J. E., & Pereira, M. B. F. L. O. (2009). Um estudo sobre o bullying no contexto escolar. Paper presented at EDUCERE – IX Congresso Nacional de Educação, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná – PUC, Curitiba, Brasil.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, S., Cross, D., & Maycock, B. (2010). “That could be me squishing chips on someone’s car.” How friends can positively influence bullying behaviours. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 31, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claro, L. (2015). Praxes. BE quer acabar com práticas “próprias de organizações clandestinas”. Jornal i. Retrieved from http://www.ionline.pt/482920.
  10. Coleyshaw, L. (2010). The power of paradigms: A discussion of the absence of bullying research in the context of the university student experience. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 5(4), 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, P., Pereira, B., Simões, H., & Farenzena, R. (2011). Vitimação em contexto escolar: Frequência e as múltiplas formas. In B. Pereira, & G. Carvalho (Coord.), Atas do VII Seminário Internacional de Educação Física, Lazer e Saúde, pp. 1897-1912. Braga: CIEC, Instituto de Educação, Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
  12. Dann, S. (2010). Redefining social marketing with contemporary commercial marketing definitions. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dias, D., & Sá, M. J. (2014a). Initiation rituals in university as lever for group cohesion. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dias, D., & Sá, M. J. (2014b). Transition to higher education: The role of initiation practices. Educational Research, 56(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Espelage, D. L. (2004). An ecological perspective to school-based bullying prevention. Prevention Researcher, 11(3), 3–6.Google Scholar
  16. Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice, 381–458.Google Scholar
  17. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: The role of group membership in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1/2). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  20. Henriques, A. (2014, July 30). Não houve um dux paranóico a conduzir jovens do Meco à morte. Jornal Público. Retrieved from http://www.publico.pt/sociedade/noticia/nao-houve-um-dux-paranoico-a-conduzir-jovens-do-meco-a-morte-1664802.
  21. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ireland, J. L. (2005). Psychological health and bullying behavior among adolescent prisoners: A study of young and juvenile offenders. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(3), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ireland, J. L., Archer, J., & Power, C. L. (2007). Characteristics of male and female prisoners involved in bullying behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 33(3), 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Juvonen, J., & Galván, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents, Duke series in child development and public policy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., Marttunen, M., Rimpelä, A., & Rantanen, P. (1999). Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: School survey. British Medical Journal, 319(7206), 348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, Y. S., Leventhal, B. L., Koh, Y.-J., Hubbard, A., & Boyce, W. T. (2006). School bullying and youth violence: Causes or consequences of psychopathologic behavior? Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(9), 1035–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(5), 282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2011). Bullying and suicide. Psychiatric Times, 28(2), 27–31.Google Scholar
  29. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. R. (2008). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. R. (2011). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. The Journal of Marketing, 35, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kotler, P., Roberto, N., & Lee, N. R. (2002). Social marketing: Improving the quality of life. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Leão, L. G. R. (2010). O fenômeno bullying no ambiente escolar. Revista FACEVV, Vila Velha, 4, pp. 119–135.Google Scholar
  35. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nielsen, M. B., Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2008). Sense of coherence as a protective mechanism among targets of workplace bullying. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(2), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nuwer, H. (2001). Wrongs of passage: Fraternities, sororities, hazing, and binge drinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  38. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Østvik, K., & Rudmin, F. (2001). Bullying and hazing among Norwegian army soldiers: two studies of prevalence, context, and cognition. Military Psychology, 13(1), 17–39.Google Scholar
  41. Peattie, K., & Peattie, S. (2009). Social marketing: A pathway to consumption reduction? Journal of Business Research, 62, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peattie, K., & Peattie, S. (2011). The social marketing mix – A critical review. In G. Hastings, K. Angus, & C. Bryant (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social marketing (pp. 152–166). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ribeiro, R. M. (2000). As lições dos aprendizes: As Praxes académicas na Universidade do Minho (unpublished Master’s dissertation in Antrophology). Universidade do Minho, Portugal.Google Scholar
  44. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanches, I (2016). Praxe: 100 Personalidades Pedem às Universidades Para Criarem Alternativas. Jornal Público. Retrieved from www.publico.pt.
  47. de Paula e Silva, A. (2010). Percepção de docentes a respeito da prática de bullying na escola. E-Revista Facitec, 1(6).Google Scholar
  48. Silva, A. C. B., & Morgado, M. A. (2011). Bullying no Ensino superior: Existe? Revista de Iniciação Científica da FFC, 11(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (2002). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., Liefooghe, A., Almeida, A., Araki, H., & Wenxin, Z. (2002). Definitions of bullying: Comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. South, C. R., & Wood, J. (2006). Bullying in prisons: The importance of perceived social status, prisonization, and moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 32(5), 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Bullying: Short-term and long-term effects, and the importance of defiance theory in explanation and prevention. Victims and Offenders, 3(2–3), 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weinreich, N. K. (2011). Hands-on social marketing – A step-by-step guide to designing change for good (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, K., Chambers, M., Logan, S., & Robinson, D. (1996). Association of common health symptoms with bullying in primary school children. British Medical Journal, 313(7048), 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolke, D., & Lereya, S. T. (2015). Long-term effects of bullying. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100(9), 879–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wymer, W. (2015). Formulating effective social marketing and public health communication strategies. In W. Wymer (Ed.), Innovations in social marketing and public health communication strategies. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research—Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Zimmerman, F. J., Glew, G. M., Christakis, D. A., & Katon, W. (2005). Early cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and television watching as predictors of subsequent bullying among grade-school children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(4), 384–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017
Categories
Hazing News

Dillard president on hazing prevention needs

Hey teacher, DON’T leave those kids alone.  The need for early antihazing interventions.

Categories
Hazing News

Therunneronline: The Kappa Alpha Psi nightmare of Brent McClanahan II, CSU Bakersfield

Powerful update on condition of paralyzed former Kappa Alpha Psi pledge http://therunneronline.com/hazing-victim-mcclanahan-moves-on/

Excerpt:

In April 2011, McClanahan, 25 at the time, returned to his parents’ home where he collapsed and was hospitalized after an initiation evening with the fraternity. He sustained herniated and ruptured discs which left him paralyzed from the waist down. He has undergone rehabilitation for his legs and has regained use of them over time. He said he still experiences drop leg, bladder control issues, and may not be able to father any more children.

McClanahan said that his beatings not only left him with severe physical injuries and costly medical bills, but psychological trauma as well. He said he has suffered from depression, night terrors, and PTSD due to his experience.

When McClanahan was in the hospital his fraternity big brother, and fellow pledges, visited to ask him if he was still interested in continuing the initiation process. His response was, “Look at me. I’m in the hospital.’ and that’s when it just clicked like, ‘what the hell am I doing here?”

According to McClanahan, the medical expenses and psychological damages became so burdensome that he reached out to the California Victim Compensation Board to help him. However, the board rejected his application stating he did not qualify as a victim because he “kept going back to be hazed,” he said.

“So I said to them, ‘Let me ask you a question. Do you say the same thing to a woman who is in a domestic violence abuse but keeps going back to her husband that keeps beating her?’…They didn’t answer my question,” said McClanahan.

After McClanahan was denied financial assistance by the state he decided to file a lawsuit against the fraternity to help cover his medical expenses.

McClanahan began discussion about filing a lawsuit against Kappa Alpha Psi in 2012.

According to him, the next year was spent discussing how to file the suit. In 2013, McClanahan filed a civil lawsuit against Kappa Alpha Psi Inc. in Los Angeles County Superior Court. During the lawsuit, allegations arose against McClanahan’s father being aware of his son’s beatings and injuries before the night his son was hospitalized. McClanahan rebukes these allegations saying that his father “was heartbroken when he found out” about the hazing that had ensued.

In August of 2014, McClanahan said the yearlong litigation resulted in a settlement. He received $2 million from the fraternities’ insurance. He has used it to settle his medical expenses, including his back surgery that had cost $250,000.

McClanahan has also decided to use his experience to benefit others. He continued his education and graduated from CSUB with a degree in history. He said he is unsure of what he plans to do, but he would like to work in a field where he can continue to share what he has learned from his experience. He considers teaching or even continuing his education, getting a master’s degree, and becoming a college professor.

“I really feel like that’s another big issue too, is we don’t have enough adults telling these students what to look out for,” said McClanahan.

At the end of 2013, McClanahan was introduced to film director Byron Hurt who has directed documentaries such as: “If Five-O Shoots,” “I Am a Man: Black Masculinity in America,” and just finished “Hazing: How Badly do you Want in?” which will feature McClanahan and his story. The film is expected to be released at the end of 2017 and will feature scenes at CSUB with McClanahan.

“It’s like I’m trying to figure out the social psychology of how one becomes a part of a group and like why, as a society, we have the people who want to be a part of a group,” said McClanahan.

McClanahan said he was grateful for the work he did with Hurt on the film. He feels that being a part of that film helped him to process his anger and depression at the time. He is grateful for the manner in which CSUB President Horace Mitchell responded to the case. He said that the physical abuse they endured never occured on campus and he has never felt that CSUB was at fault for his ordeal.