According to Limestone athletic director Larry Epperly, “I think if they had to do it over again they would act in a different manner. These pictures are certainly embarrassing to the college and we’re embarrassed this kind of activity took place, and it’s our job to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

Agreed, Coach. Now it’s your job to investigate whether hazing occurred–Hank Nuwer, Moderator (quote from Badjocks.com)

Hazing News

Zach Dunlevy lacrosse death–Limestone athletes required to bring bottle to party. Details still scanty, and articles have included puffball questions by reporters.

Link is here. Reporters have been pretty lax in asking tough questions.

How about these questions?

What does it mean that athletes were REQUIRED to bring a bottle?

Why no arrests for underaged drinking? Why no investigation to see if the party was pre-described as an initiation for the deceased, Zach Dunlevy?

Who threw the party and for what purpose?

Did anyone order Dunlevy to take shots as a rookie?

Were new athletes (rookies) asked to drink more or to drink at all because they were rookies?

What did the coach and athletic director know about past initiations? What have they learned about this one?

DID ANYONE TAKE PICTURES?

This story is many days old, and hard questions have NOT been asked, in my opinion.