Categories
Hazing News

History of Hazing: Some thoughts

Here is the link to article.

Interview below:

An expert explains the history of hazing

Hank Nuwer has kept a record of every hazing death since 1838

Hank Nuwer is a professor of journalism at Franklin College. He has spent over 30 years researching the topic of hazing on college campuses and has compiled a database of hazing-related deaths dating back to 1838. He is passionate about the prevention of hazing and has written extensively on the topic, both online and in print, in attempt to shed light on a serious issue on college campuses.

We asked Professor Nuwer about his research on hazing, current hazing law, and the future of hazing prevention on campus.

Screen Shot 2016-08-26 at 1.55.19 PM

A still from Goat, a film about frat hazing with James Franco

How did you get started with your hazing research?

It goes way back to 1975 when I was a graduate student at Nevada Reno. There was a death on campus involving a group that was no longer active but were still recruiting, called The Sundowners. They had a couple of initiations that were very public. One on campus, one just across from school property, and another at a bar pretty much caddy corner from where I lived.

I saw all three of those, and at the bar, there was a man frothing under the pool table. I got them to walk him through the night and he lived, but the next time they did an initiation, to get away from bad publicity, they did it on a Native American reservation at Pyramid Lake. It was so far removed and there was so much alcohol that one died and one had brain damage.

I contacted Human Behavior magazine and got the assignment. I had a really tough editor who had me calling all of these behavior experts, and the thing that was most significant was all the research at that time was found in abnormal psychology journals and education journals. And to me, [hazing] was bizarre and strange, but it certainly wasn’t uncommon or abnormal. It’s a common practice, and as we’ve seen with the survey, about half of all students today are participating. So I started the research in 1975 and the article was published in 1978. I’ve been writing about it ever since.

Why do organizations practice hazing? What kinds of psychological effects does hazing have on loyalty to an organization?

This is kind of interesting because I’m working on a book called The Revised Hazing Reader. I have an author, a young dissertation writer, who is looking at African American fraternities. It varies within the groups themselves. Some of it may be the idea of tradition, in others it might be status and power. Those two are pretty consistent – status and power.

Another possibility could be inertia. Starting with an organization, being a joiner, having a tradition yourself of never quitting and always finishing projects – all of those things go into it. I don’t think you could come up with a single answer for it all. But with the African American fraternities – if I can generalize – it’s the idea of belonging to something greater than yourself. That was extremely important as a bonding mechanism in the days before civil rights.

Screen Shot 2016-08-26 at 1.54.36 PM

What are the most interesting patterns you’ve come across in your research?

I’ve emphasized the history in my writing. The DKE Club started at Yale and morphed into Delta Kappa Epsilon. It’s just so interesting – they had a death at Yale. They had members like Theodore Roosevelt. They were the single fraternity that had all that expansion at the time.

And so, for me, as fraternities have changed and evolved over time, it’s incredible that fraternities are still around and prospering. They don’t always accommodate themselves to the times and the values of society. Fraternities have traditionally, particularly in the last 50 years, run against a lot of criticism, a lot of attempts to shut them down. Some [shutdowns] have ended up being successful, yet fraternities go on and on with member and alumni support. It’s easier to understand why people haze than it is to understand why fraternities continue when you start looking at the overall picture.

Why do you think we hear so much about hazing in fraternities and less about hazing in sororities and other female organizations?

I try to keep a database on deaths, and there’s definitely a drop off in violent hazing in sororities. The issue with sororities now would be, at the University of Alabama, for example, a refusal to admit African American women and an insistence by some members there that it would lower the status of the sororities. I find that more problematic. And then there are issues such as bulimia, weight issues, and conformist types of things.

Many states have anti-hazing laws. How, if at all, have these affected college hazing practices?

Only a couple of states – primarily Florida and Texas – have seen real effects of hazing laws. We’ve seen people go to jail in Florida, for example, for six years, with the threat of an additional 15 for manslaughter in that state.

But in most states, the laws are mainly symbolic and need to be restructured and rewritten. A lot of legislators are former members of fraternities, sororities, or sports teams. There’s a lot of compromise, and there have been so many attempts to get laws changed.

The laws at the federal level – there have been at least four or five – have been disastrously written and there’s a slim chance of them getting passed because they violate the Constitution. You can point to the weakness of law as one of the reasons why hazing continues.
Screen Shot 2016-08-26 at 1.48.47 PM

Given the weakness of law, do you think there’s anything that colleges can do to prevent hazing once and for all?

Well, they should have done it a long time ago. Fraternities and sororities were hazing a lot, and schools published customs books trying to support some of these things. Going back 125 years, there was an attempt to stop some of the boisterousness of undergraduates who had been targeting the faculty. You know, locking cows in the chapel and in essence bullying the faculty.

And then, when schools were being founded, there was the belief that school spirit was really important. Because of this, faculty saw hazing – especially of freshmen and sophomores – as a way to get alumni support once these people graduated. It really got engrained, and it’s one of the bad habits that will probably never be completely eradicated.

When will your next book be available?

The Revised Hazing Reader [now title Hazing: Destroying Young Lives] will be out in April [2018] from Indiana University Press. It’s 140,000 words, and I’m excited about this book because it’s really going into a lot of disciplines: sociology, criminal justice, folklore, journalism, investigative reporting, psychology, African American studies, and feminist studies. So I don’t think anyone has ever looked at anything in the way this book is going to: with all the experts involved.

 

Categories
Hazing News

Scholarship to Download: The Final Battle: Constructs of Hegemonic Masculinity and Hypermasculinity in Fraternity Membership

Here is the link to secure the PDF copy of the article.

The Final Battle: Constructs of Hegemonic Masculinity and Hypermasculinity in Fraternity Membership
Alex Zernechel and April L. Perry

Categories
Hazing News

The root of all university hazing: back in the day

Here is the link

And an excerpt.

 

FIFTEENTH-CENTURY EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES HAD A problem. Their incoming students were young and unruly, so confident in their own abilities that they did not apply the requisite level of effort in class. So universities instituted hazing requirements; before their education could begin, new students needed to complete humiliating tasks in order to be purged of their pride, gluttony, and other sins.

According to The Medieval Magazine, some of these hazing rituals included becoming a de facto servant to an upperclassman—as at the University of Avignon in France—or paying for other students to go to the baths (which was deemed immoral only when the university faculty weren’t also invited).

But perhaps the strangest and most elaborate of the hazing rituals was Deposition, a practice that predominated with slight variations in both Germany and Sweden beginning in the late 1400s In order to enroll in their chosen universities, students in these countries endured a bizarre series of tests that makes the modern college application process look simple.

The best recorded accounts take place at Uppsala University in Sweden in the 15th and 16th centuries, but the practice existed in most of Germany at the time as well. Details vary slightly, but Deposition seems to have worked like this:

When new students—all of whom were male—arrived at a university, they announced their presence to the dean. Then they waited. Once enough people requested to study at the school, the dean scheduled a Deposition, so that the new students could formally enroll.

Categories
Hazing News

The Death of a Marine Muslim in Boot Camp Probed by New York Times

Here is the link to NY Times

Excerpt

In his 1984 memoir, ‘‘First to Fight,’’ the esteemed Marine brigadier general Victor Krulak, known as Brute, spoke of the ‘‘almost mystical alchemy’’ that happens during boot camp, whose shared hardships he saw as ‘‘the genesis of the enduring sense of brotherhood that characterizes the corps.’’ But the lines between hard training and abuse can blur. Like every other branch of the military, the Marine Corps has official strictures against hazing, which it defines as any unauthorized verbal or physical conduct of a ‘‘cruel, abusive, humiliating, oppressive, demeaning or harmful’’ nature. The Marines have nonetheless investigated hundreds of hazing allegations in the past five years alone. (The particulars of the hazing incidents in this article were taken largely from redacted reports prepared by the Marines in the course of their investigations. Details like names and dialogue were provided by eyewitnesses and other recruits.) ‘‘There is a natural tension between an organization that trains people for lethality and the larger culture,’’ a Marine reserve officer told me. ‘‘Inside the culture, you’re supposed to be able to take a punch and give a punch and crush a skull. Outside, this is not something that’s valued.’’

The bedrock of Marine tradition is a long-ago era when buff, male and mostly white combat Marines launched amphibious early-morning assaults on enemy beaches armed with M1 rifles and Ka-Bar knives. Today’s far less homogeneous troops roll into battle in armored Humvees or tanks, with sophisticated high-powered weaponry and thermal-imaging goggles. Many never leave their base at all, waging war remotely while operating a joystick or writing code. In many ways, the Marines have become indistinguishable from the Army.

Adapting to these harsh truths hasn’t been easy for the corps, whose current and former officials, with some exceptions, were reluctant to speak openly about these challenges except on condition of anonymity. ‘‘The Marines have a purpose, and it’s a militant purpose,’’ one senior officer says. ‘‘We are an organization grounded on the physical, but wars are not as physical anymore. The character of war has evolved a lot from the early 20th century. The question is: Has our force evolved? I don’t think it has.’’

2) Second excerpt

Across Parris Island, commanders of the different training battalions were contending with hazing allegations ranging from abusive language to assault. In an internal memo from the spring of 2015, the commander of Parris Island’s First Recruit Training Battalion noted that ‘‘staying on top of D.I. hazing/misconduct’’ was his biggest challenge. ‘‘It’s never-ending,’’ he wrote. This was even more pronounced in the Third Recruit Training Battalion, which, as one commander wrote, attracted ‘‘Type-A’’ personalities who may not ‘‘rebound from past mistakes.’’

Isolated in a remote corner of the depot, the Third had long been a rogue fief on Parris Island, its silent pact with Marine officialdom being that it would create the most disciplined recruits but would do so in its own way. It had operated in this manner for more than 60 years, and even in the era of values-based training, the Third was virtually unchanged.

In 1998, a Navy chaplain, Thomas Creely, now retired, came to Parris Island to serve as chaplain for the recruit training regiment and noticed a particularly stark pattern of abuse in the Third. ‘‘For example,’’ he later wrote in a paper presented to the International Society for Military Ethics, ‘‘after lunch recruits were made to drink water until they vomited. Then they were made to do push-ups in their own vomit.’’ Creely worked with the command until 2003 to try to eradicate the problem, but the ‘‘blind loyalty of drill instructors,’’ who remained silent in the face of abuse, stood in the way. ‘‘What you have in the Third Battalion is a cycle of abuse,’’ Creely told me recently. ‘‘And until that cycle is broken, it doesn’t matter how much education you do.’’

Lt. Col. Joshua Kissoon, who commanded the Third Battalion while Germano was on the base, was a by-the-book Marine who publicly took a hard stance against hazing. Shortly after assuming command, he instituted a zero-tolerance policy on the touching of recruits by their D.I.s and put his staff on warning: Any violation of the rules would be investigated. Between 2013 and 2015, 221 preliminary hazing investigations were conducted across the depot’s four battalions; 69 of those were from the Third, and more were punished from that battalion than any other. This included three D.I.s who were recommended for courts-martial after an investigation first reported by Wade Livingston at The Beaufort Gazette in February 2015 revealed a ‘‘staggering level of misconduct and recruit abuse,’’ with recruits reporting that they were choked, kicked and punched in the face, and that they had their heads slammed against walls.

Some junior officers felt the D.I.s were being punished unfairly, though they themselves were never in the squad bays. (One later said his presence in the barracks ‘‘undermines’’ the drill instructors.) When Colonel Kissoon received the results of his own Command Climate Survey in April 2015, they were not much better than Germano’s. That spring, Kissoon began to take a softer line in some cases, according to Marines in the battalion. On his desktop, his subordinates later said, he kept a redacted copy of the command investigation that led to Germano’s firing. ‘‘This could happen to me,’’ he told colleagues.

It was into this environment of ‘‘inconsistent decision making,’’ as some of Kissoon’s officers put it, that a new group of Third Batallion recruits landed in April 2015. Most were straight out of high school. A few had been college students. Two had master’s degrees. Another had been living in his car. All now learned their survival depended on how they handled the cognitive dissonance between what they learned as official Marine Corps policy and how that policy was systematically ignored.

Jake Weaver, then 19, a new member of Platoon 3054, Lima Company, recalls that when he met his D.I.s, they gave him and his fellow recruits a choice. ‘‘You want to be trained like Marines, right? Not like crappy ‘individual’ Marines?’’

Continue reading the main story

Moderator:  This is an outstanding investigation. And equally wrenching. Hank Nuwer
Categories
Hazing News

News from Bangkok

Freshman hazing assailed.